Post by Uncle Buddy on Mar 24, 2020 17:47:17 GMT -8
Or is it Cecil Houx Chambliss?
When an old man in his mid-80s responded to a genealogical query from a relative, he wrote his long-dead grandson's middle name as "Houx". Or else his handwriting was hard to read, or...? That shouldn't have been a problem but it is because the relative who wrote the query then wrote a book, and from now till the end of genealogical time, Cecil Hartwell Chambliss will be known as Cecil Houx Chambliss or Cecil Hartwell Chambliss since genealogists are in a hurry to fill out a big tree and don't stop to check facts. The fact is, he went by the nickname "Jack".
It's also being stated that "maybe" Cecil's father Charles H. Chambliss died in the Spanish American War. Then other genealogists just delete the inconvenient "maybe" and the poor man is dead before his time. He actually died in 1948, after four marriages, two of them to Cecil's mother.
Proving that Cecil's middle name is Hartwell is too easy to detail here. Some folks are getting it right since it's kinda obvious. For example, his World War I draft registration clearly states all the pertinent facts needed to identify him correctly including his middle name. So we won't belabor the obvious.
But it would be interesting to prove that his father didn't die in the Spanish American War, because it took at least an hour of research to prove that the two Charles H. Chamblisses from the same time and place are really the same person. Before I start on the proof I'll try to spice up the story a little bit with a few interesting facts.
Cecil's father wanted to be a newspaperman. His father was a schoolteacher and a Baptist minister of the fire-and-brimstone variety. His brother also took up the preaching trade. Cecil was the youngest son of a large family. I'd guess he must have been under a lot of pressure, trying to start his own newspaper as a very young man. Cecil's mother, Fannie Rixey, daughter of a prominent local businessman, divorced him once for cruelty and non-support, accusing him of beating her and the child. A year or two later they remarried. The second divorce apparently didn't make the papers, or more likely they'd left town by then and the Mexico, Missouri newspaper wasn't notified. So researchers have decided that "maybe" Charles died in the war, and then the "maybe" became bothersome and was dropped.
Maybe the "maybe" comes about since Fannie and Cecil are found living with her parents in 1900 and her marital status is something illegible scrawled over by something else illegible. In proper genealogy practice, this means her marital status can't be determined from that source, but in actuality a scribble has been read as a "W" for "widowed". In reality, what probably happened is that whoever was answering the census taker's questions found the question of her marital status hard to answer directly and probably found the question embarrassing since Fannie had quit the same marriage twice. Not Fannie's fault, no doubt, but still an embarrassment to a prominent business family. If the scrawl really is a "W", that doesn't prove anything because single and divorced mothers back then would sometimes call themselves "Mrs." and "widow" their whole life to avoid stigma. In genealogy, if there's any reason to doubt a source, such as illegibility, a fact is not a fact till there are two or more sources that say more or less the same thing.
Cecil was a smart kid with a lot of drive and imagination. He won a beautiful baby contest. His letter to Santa Claus (probably written by his mother) was published in the Mexico paper. He published a classified ad looking for work. As a teenager he invented a compressed air powered airplane that made its own electricity and could travel hundreds of miles on its own, taking energy from the air itself. (Some kind of solar heat absorber.) He moved to Colorado where he had four claims on gold mining sites. He wrote home to announce he was planning to marry a girl who'd won a race in Cheyenne, Wyoming. We don't know if this marriage ever took place, but like several of his life dreams, it was announced in the newspaper back home in Mexico, Missouri. He also lived in Florida briefly.
Cecil tried to volunteer for World War I but was turned down due to physical disabilities of some kind. So when they tried to draft him, he claimed exemption on those grounds but they drafted him anyway. Unfortunately he contracted pneumonia while in boot camp and died in a hospital where no one even knew where he was from. A few weeks later, his mother told the papers she'd given his compressed air powered airplane to the government, and this article was published in papers all over the country. By this time, Fannie had married an Irish fella in St. Louis. She never had another child, and lived to the age of 97.
In the next post, I'll prove that Fannie's first two husbands, Charles H. Chambliss, did not die in the Spanish American War.
When an old man in his mid-80s responded to a genealogical query from a relative, he wrote his long-dead grandson's middle name as "Houx". Or else his handwriting was hard to read, or...? That shouldn't have been a problem but it is because the relative who wrote the query then wrote a book, and from now till the end of genealogical time, Cecil Hartwell Chambliss will be known as Cecil Houx Chambliss or Cecil Hartwell Chambliss since genealogists are in a hurry to fill out a big tree and don't stop to check facts. The fact is, he went by the nickname "Jack".
It's also being stated that "maybe" Cecil's father Charles H. Chambliss died in the Spanish American War. Then other genealogists just delete the inconvenient "maybe" and the poor man is dead before his time. He actually died in 1948, after four marriages, two of them to Cecil's mother.
Proving that Cecil's middle name is Hartwell is too easy to detail here. Some folks are getting it right since it's kinda obvious. For example, his World War I draft registration clearly states all the pertinent facts needed to identify him correctly including his middle name. So we won't belabor the obvious.
But it would be interesting to prove that his father didn't die in the Spanish American War, because it took at least an hour of research to prove that the two Charles H. Chamblisses from the same time and place are really the same person. Before I start on the proof I'll try to spice up the story a little bit with a few interesting facts.
Cecil's father wanted to be a newspaperman. His father was a schoolteacher and a Baptist minister of the fire-and-brimstone variety. His brother also took up the preaching trade. Cecil was the youngest son of a large family. I'd guess he must have been under a lot of pressure, trying to start his own newspaper as a very young man. Cecil's mother, Fannie Rixey, daughter of a prominent local businessman, divorced him once for cruelty and non-support, accusing him of beating her and the child. A year or two later they remarried. The second divorce apparently didn't make the papers, or more likely they'd left town by then and the Mexico, Missouri newspaper wasn't notified. So researchers have decided that "maybe" Charles died in the war, and then the "maybe" became bothersome and was dropped.
Maybe the "maybe" comes about since Fannie and Cecil are found living with her parents in 1900 and her marital status is something illegible scrawled over by something else illegible. In proper genealogy practice, this means her marital status can't be determined from that source, but in actuality a scribble has been read as a "W" for "widowed". In reality, what probably happened is that whoever was answering the census taker's questions found the question of her marital status hard to answer directly and probably found the question embarrassing since Fannie had quit the same marriage twice. Not Fannie's fault, no doubt, but still an embarrassment to a prominent business family. If the scrawl really is a "W", that doesn't prove anything because single and divorced mothers back then would sometimes call themselves "Mrs." and "widow" their whole life to avoid stigma. In genealogy, if there's any reason to doubt a source, such as illegibility, a fact is not a fact till there are two or more sources that say more or less the same thing.
Cecil was a smart kid with a lot of drive and imagination. He won a beautiful baby contest. His letter to Santa Claus (probably written by his mother) was published in the Mexico paper. He published a classified ad looking for work. As a teenager he invented a compressed air powered airplane that made its own electricity and could travel hundreds of miles on its own, taking energy from the air itself. (Some kind of solar heat absorber.) He moved to Colorado where he had four claims on gold mining sites. He wrote home to announce he was planning to marry a girl who'd won a race in Cheyenne, Wyoming. We don't know if this marriage ever took place, but like several of his life dreams, it was announced in the newspaper back home in Mexico, Missouri. He also lived in Florida briefly.
Cecil tried to volunteer for World War I but was turned down due to physical disabilities of some kind. So when they tried to draft him, he claimed exemption on those grounds but they drafted him anyway. Unfortunately he contracted pneumonia while in boot camp and died in a hospital where no one even knew where he was from. A few weeks later, his mother told the papers she'd given his compressed air powered airplane to the government, and this article was published in papers all over the country. By this time, Fannie had married an Irish fella in St. Louis. She never had another child, and lived to the age of 97.
In the next post, I'll prove that Fannie's first two husbands, Charles H. Chambliss, did not die in the Spanish American War.